Englisch-Deutsch – die neusten Beiträge

describe a cartoon?

Hey Leute, meine Aufgabestellung lautet: describe the picture and discuss the truth about this stereotype in a text of min. 100 words on your own.

Habe ich es richtig beschrieben? Habt ihr Änderungs-Verbesserungvorschläge?

On this cartoon we can see two situations: on the first one we see a man drowning and another man walking his dog on the path walk. The drowning man is asking for help but the man with the dog doesn't even bother to look at him. On the second one we have the same situation, but, this time, the man with the dog actually helps the other man. The difference is that this time, the drowning man is polite when he asks for help and that made all the difference. Instead of just shouting for help, he said: "Excuse me, Sir. I'm terribly sorry to bother you, but I wonder if you would mind helping me a moment, as long as it's no trouble, of course.". This cartoon portrays the British's politenes. Of course that in real life no one would be so polite when drowning; we would just shout "help" like the man in the first situation. But, we have to face it: British are more polite than everybody else. I'm not saying that the ones who aren't British are inferior or less educated, but it's true that they often forget words like "please" and "thank you". On this cartoon being polite makes the difference between life and death. It may be a little extreme, but who knows if it may or may not come true. So, if you happen to have a son, a daughter, a student who misbehaves and has lack of politeness, or if you just want them to be even more polite or educated than what you taught them to br, send them to England. Undoubtedly, they would thank you. At least, I know I would.

Bild zum Beitrag
Englisch lernen, Englisch, Schule, Cartoon, Englisch-Deutsch, englische Grammatik, Englischunterricht, English-Grammar, Bildbeschreibung, Diskussionsrunde

Habe ich meine Englisch Aufgaben richtig bearbeitet?

Hey Leute, ich würde mich echt freuen, wenn mal jemand raufschauen könnte😊!

Material:

Aufgaben:

1. Make a table with the statistics and pledges for the four countries.

Meine Lösung:

 2. State in a short text, what the oaths and pledges have in common and how they differ.

Lösung: The differences between the two ideologies is striking. If one swears an oath to the Constitution, it implies limited government by definition. It also implies that individual rights are paramount in the American system of governance. But when one swears to support the government instead of the Constitution, those principles disappear. An oath is self-pledging by which a subject or citizen acknowledges a duty of allegiance and swears loyalty to the monarch or country. In republics, modern oaths are sworn to the country in general or to the country's constitution.                                                                                                                   Also, this is a formal and serious promise to tell the truth or do something an offensive or rude word used to express anger, frustration, surprise, etc. Oath, as mentioned above, can mean either a formal promise or an insulting word. Additionally, an oath is more often used when the person making the promise calls God as a witness to the event, such as in the Boy Scout Promise. This often comes with a price if not kept; this can be death. In my personal opinion, an oath is presented as the most "serious" of the three words. In contrast to Oath, Pledge is a serious promise or agreement a promise to give money and something you leave to another person to show that you will keep your promise.                   Pledge is much less formal. Similarly, the Pledge of Allegiance is a promise of loyalty to one's country. Often, the pledge refers to an amount of money that someone is willing to give to another person.

3. Which of the countries’ oath is the most agreeable to you? Explain why.     The United States of America: Oath of Allegiance is the most agreeable oath to me because this serves to remind us that the United States is a constitutional republic with a federal system. The Oath also reminds us that the Constitution is the cornerstone of the American system. The government is supposed to be bound by the Constitution. As such, the government is not omnipotent, but strictly limited to the functions and purposes enumerated in the Constitution. Legislation, no matter how popular, is to be consistent with it, and any laws that conflict with it are invalid. 

Bild zum Beitrag
Englisch lernen, Englisch, Sprache, Englisch-Deutsch, englische Grammatik, English-Grammar, Englischsprachig, english-deutsche übersetzung

Sprachniveau verbessern?

Benötige gute Tipps zur Verbesserung meiner Sprachkenntnisse in Englisch. Derzeitiges Niveau ist schon so B1. Mein Ziel ist C1 oder höher.

Wieso will er den Gottes willen so schnell und zeitaufwendig Englisch lernen? - WEIL die Einstellungsvoraussetzung meines Traumjobs das so verlangt...!

———————————————————————Zurzeit bevorzuge bsw. mach ich nur die Methoden die unten aufgezählt wurden. Natürlich bin ich dafür bereit mehr zu tun.
Mit Netflix, Büchern und evtl neuen Hobbys würde ich mich gerne aufarbeiten.

Zu meiner Person, besuche die 9. Klasse einer Realschule somit hab ich noch ein paar Jahre bis zum Abi vor mir.

Meine Schwächen sind eher das Sprechen und die Aussprache/Wortschatz. Grammatik fällt mir nicht so schwer wie gedacht.

Schüleraustausche kommen für mich nicht in Frage genauso wie Aufenthalte.

———————————————————————

Methoden: z.B. Vokabeln lernen, Lieblingssongs nachsingen und verstehen

Netflix: Gute Serien/Filme für Anfänger bsw. Fortgeschrittene ?

Bücher: welche die man so im Jugendalter liest bsw. Keine Romane oder sowas... . Harry Porter z.B.

Hobbys: Kennt jemand hobbies oder irgendwelche Plattformen wo man gegenseitig auf englisch kommuniziert?^^

Sonstiges: für weitere Vorschläge bin ich offen...

———————————————————————
Meine anderen Fragen wären:

  • Wie habt ihr eine Sprache auf dauerweise gelernt?
  • Wie lange hat das gedauert
  • und was waren eure Methoden?

———————————————————————
So danke für das Durchlesen, alles gute und schon mal im Voraus bedanke ich mich herzlich bei euch :)

Liebe Grüße

BecomeAPilot, kurz Max

Englisch, Lernen, Schule, verbessern, Sprache, Englisch-Deutsch, englische Grammatik, Realschule, Merkfähigkeit

Englischtext - Korrektur?

The given extract “The Welcome Table” by Alice Walker, written in 1973, deals with an old, black woman who stands up for her rights and goes into a white’s church. The author uses effective stylistic devices to present the white churchgoer’s various concerns about the old woman and her behaviour.

First, when the old woman arrives at the steps of the church, the churchgoers are kind of confused and do not know what to do or how to react. They gaze mustering and astonished at her, “[b]ut for those who search[…] hastily for ‘reasons’ in that tight old face, […] there [i]s nothing to be read.” (ll. 5ff.)

The author uses many diverse adjectives to make her story more vivid; she is not only describing exactly what the old woman looks like, but what the white churchgoer’s feelings and emotions are like. Due to the usage of the contrast that they feel “a terror of the unknown as well as of the deeply known” (ll. 8f.), she presents the churchgoer’s helplessness and confusion which soon change into a feeling of fear.

Nevertheless, not all of them are reacting the same way. Some speak words about her that are “hardly fit to be heard” (l. 10), others stay calm and peacefully (l. 10), and some feel “vague stirrings of pity, […] as if she [is] […] an old collie turned out to die.” (ll. 11f.) Even though most of them are afraid of supporting the black community in public or only have got an useless tiny feeling of pity, the author wants to show that you cannot peg all of them as racist or being afraid of African Americans – they all have got different backgrounds and moral values.

Some of the churchgoers see an old, frail and sordid woman (l. 18), others see a servant (ll. 19f.), but “[m]any of them [see] […] jungle orgies in an evil place” (ll. 20f.) or “riotous anarchists” (l. 21). Some fear an assault against Christianity (ll. 23f.) and see an “invasion of privacy” (l. 24). Still, the author keeps this explicit as feelings and not actions; the white people may be afraid of the old woman’s silent opposition, but they are not acting until the old woman enters the church.

The reverend asks her “pleasantly” (l. 30) to leave the church. The old woman takes no move to leave, she sits down and gaze “with concentration at the stained-glass window over her head” (ll. 35f.) No words could bother her in any way.

The final step is taken by the “ladies” (l. 42), which are afraid of the old woman and “[d]aring their burly indecisive husbands to throw the old colored woman out” (ll. 42f.) They make their point very clear. “Could their husbands expect them to sit up in church with that [– the old woman]? No, no, the husbands were quick to answer and even quicker to do their duty.” (ll. 47f.) They place their “hard fists” (l. 49) “[u]nder the old woman’s arms” (l. 49), flex their shoulders (l. 51) and “out she [flies] […] through the door”. (l. 51f.)

WEITER GEHT'S IN DEN KOMMENTAREN! DANKE!!! :-)

Englisch, Schule, Englisch-Deutsch

Meistgelesene Beiträge zum Thema Englisch-Deutsch