Summary – die besten Beiträge

1. Comment on the pressure the British feel to maintain the myth of their identity. How should other nations deal with them ?

was würdet ihr dazu sagen ?

Comment on the Quote: "We're colossal, hit-it-out-of-the-park cultural over-achievers" (I1. 44-45) and explain what attitude the author is criticising.

kann mir jemand dabei helfen ?
was meine er damit ?

Der Text

Essay: Pet and Teenagers

Should teenagers be exposed to pets at their age?

Having a pet at a early age helps teenagers learn about responsibility and taking care of others. At the same time, it can help them learn to take care of themselves. Some teenagers though, should never have pets of their own if they can’t control themselves and have difficulty with empathy. Therefore: Should teenagers be exposed to pets at their age?

Teenagers mature at different rates. Some can handle the responsibility of caring for a pet already and others not. That’s why the age is for the parent to decide. If teenagers are animal-friendly, then cats make excellent pets. They can be playful and entertaining, especially if people adopt a kitten. They are also relatively easy to take care for: good quality food, clean water, a clean litter box, toys and interaction with their owners for affection.

As mentioned, owning a pet helps in the development of a teenager for example learning to take responsibility for another life and experience what it means if someone depends on them. A pet also helps teenagers learning to give attention even if they are not in the mood for it.

Despite of that, how can teenagers even cover the costs of keeping a pet? Well, pets are expensive but if teenagers have a pet, they can buy cheap food or cheap toys, if they want to cover their costs. Teenagers can also spend their pocket money more for their pet or can earn some money in holidays.

To conclude, I would say teenagers should keep a pet, if they are ready to take care of it. If they care for their pet, they return the love. A pet doesn't question what kind of job the kid’s parents have or how much money they make, etc. They would love their owners if they show affection to it.

Wofür steht das 's in diesem Text:

it has even been possible to reconstruct the kinship of the house's inhabitants

Hallo, ich muss in Englisch ein formaler Brief bzw E-Mail schreiben wobei ich die Vorteile von Austauschschüler benenne. Der Anfang meines Hauptteil lautet:

Firstly through the student exchange many students lear their personality better and develop it further.A student exchange often gives them the opportunity to start from scratch. They try new things and learn how to deal with conflicts and problems independently.

Kann jemand mir bitte es für mich korrigieren?

Danke

Hallo, wird in der Summary bei Englisch Klausuren nur das Simple Present verwendet oder darf man bei der Reproduktion von narrativen Texten auch auf das Present Progressive zurückgreifen?

Ist diese Summary gut geschrieben und in Simple tense? Kann einer für mich das einmal gucken? Wäre super nett.

Könntet ihr bitte tips und gerne eure Meinung zu dieser Summary geben?

The speech extract “The importance of students exchanges” from Michelle Obama published in the year 2014 is about how important studying abroad is and what we can learn in an other country.

Michelle Obama expresses in her speech, that studying abroad is not just about spending a semester in any country it is much more than that. It is more to improve yourself, facing new challenges and learning the habits in the country. All of these facts can have good consequences for your school grades after coming back from studying abroad. Furthermore facing big challenges can really help in life whether it is finding a new job in a new country or facing the problems of the climate change. These are really good habits that you can learn by studyiing abroad and that is why Michelle Obama finds is so important.

Guten Abend,vor eine Weile habe ich Summary geschrieben.Jedoch war sie nicht sehr gut.Desghalb habe ich sie heute verbessert und hoffe das die Summary ganz okay geworden ist.

Danke für eure Hilfe!

LG Mo

hallo kann jemand das mit kontrollieren

Hallo,ich brauche dringend Hilfe in meiner Summary,ich habe große Schwierigkeiten eine zuschreiben da ich in Englisch ziemlich schlecht bin.Deshalb habe ich grade eine geübt zuschreiben.

Vielen lieben Dank für eure Hilfe!

Wir haben einen 1000 Wörter Text erhalten, den wir zusammenfassen mussten. Nun habe ich Angst, dass ich es zu detailliert zusammengefasst habe. Ich habe ein Blatt (Vorderseite) und ein Blatt( Vor- und Rückseite geschrieben).

Wie viele Punkte können dadurch abgezogen werden?

Ich bin mir halt nicht sicher, ob mein comment in Fach Englisch mir gelungen ist, daher wäre ein Feedback nett :)

Many people argue whether or not the British monarchy should be abolished.

In the following, I present arguments for and against a monarchy so that you can form your own pinion.

On the one hand, the British monarchy should be abolished because a monarch only rules but has no real political power or function. this means that a queen or king is unnecessary and unimportant to the state.

Also, the UK is not a democracy, as is claimed, because in a democracy people can elect the head of state, but since the royal family is still alive, they will continue to be the head of state.

This is very unfair and unequal to the rest of the population.

Also, people can never be 100% sure if the next monarch is good for the state and does not have bad intentions.

This could make people very worried.

Another important aspect is that the royal family spends a lot of money on the palace when they could use the money for more important things.

On the other hand, the British monarchy should not be abolished, because a monarch is very important even if he or she has no real political power.  

His or her importance is reflected in national stability.

Since a monarch embodies the British history, values and tradition, this leads to stronger national identification, which brings people closer together so that there is national stability.

In addition, members of the royal family are very important to charities, because since the royal family has a good image and is important, charities can be heard better, so they continue with their charities.

Some people may think that a monarch spends a lot of money, but that doesn't mean a president doesn't.

there are many presidents with many

There are also many presidents with many offices, even more than the British monarch.

The fact that the royal family has always been at the head of the state means that people trust it because they know its good intentions.

This means that the monarchy is in safe hands, so to speak.

Another important point is that the royal family has shown that it can modernize and adapt to the times.  

This is very important because many people claim that they are unmodern and have different thoughts than today.

But the Queen, for example, has allowed her son Charles to marry a divorced woman, whereas in the past this was a very dangerous issue. 

that means she was able to “modernise”. 

Weighing the pros and cons of the British monarchy, one can say that it should not be abolished because the British monarchy has been very successful, mainly because it has adapted to the times and modernized.

Hallo,

Ich habe hier eine Summary zu den Folgenen Text Geschrieben und Wollte Fragen was man da eventuell ändern könnte und ob die Struktur so gut ist und ob das Sprachlich auch gut ist.

VG

Nico

Hey, würde mich gerne freuen wenn ihr mir eventuell Verbesserungsvorschläge gibt :) Vor allem bin ich mir bei meiner conclusion nicht sicher

Danke!

Should the British monarchy be abolished? 

Lots of people argue about whether the British monarchy should be abolished or not since the Queen recently died. 

Therefore, I will list arguments for and against the monarch so that you can form your own opinion. 

On one hand, a monarch is seen as a representative of the country.

That is, he or she embodies traditional national values, unity and history.

This leads to stronger national identification and brings people closer together. 

That is why many people say that a monarchy brings stability.

In addition, members of the royal family have important roles at the head of all kinds of charities, and because of their image and popularity, they help charities continue their good work. 

Another positive aspect is that the British monarchy has shown that it is able to reform and adapt to modern times. An example of this would be that Prince Charles was allowed to marry a divorced women. 

It can also be said that the queen or king is perhaps the most expensive monarch in Europe, but that does not mean that a president would be cheaper.

On the other hand, the monarch has no real political power, which means that his or her functions are mainly formal and could easily be taken away by other political bodies or an elected president. 

Although many members of the Royal Family head charities they do not really engage in political work for those charities but rather serve as a kind of figurehead. 

But it is precisely a monarchy that harms democracy, because the people cannot elect the head of state. 

Also, a monarch has no consequences to face when making mistakes and since Britain is a hereditary monarchy, nobody knows whether the next monarch will have good or bad intentions. 

Therefore, it can be said that the royal family is a symbol of an unjust and unequal society. 

Weighing the pros and cons one come to the conclusion that the monarchy has many positive sides, for example, it brings stability or embodies history, but the negative sides mask this.

because since the country is a democracy, the monarchy should be abolished so that people can choose for themselves who should be the next monarch so that there is equality. 

Hallo, ich brauche eure Hilfe.
Mein Thema im Englischunterricht ist: summarys. Da ich gerade eine geschrieben habe, wollte ich fragen, ob jemand mir Tipps, Verbesserungsvorschläge geben kann. Wäre sehr lieb!

Der Artikel ( ist nicht gut zu erkennen, leider.)

Meine Zusammenfassung:

The article “The comeback of the written word” written by Gideon Spanier on 18 July 2021 deals with the popularity of text- based communication. 

At the beginning, the author mentions British statistics. He states that text-based communication gets more famous and even more popular than talking in person with someone. Furthermore, he points out that 16-24 year olds use digital communication everyday to stay in contact with friends and family members. In addition,  the number of phone calls on both mobile and landlines fell for the first time in 2011. According to media regulator Ofcom Communications Market Report, the power of text-based communication is higher, because the new technology let us communicate in a highly effective way.

Ist meine Zusammenfassung gut gelungen? Wenn nein, was könnte ich besser machen?
Welche Schulnoten 1-6 würdet ihr mir geben?
Vielen Dank für eure Hilfe!

Hallo wir schreiben morgen ein English Klassenarbeit und ich kann dises Twxt nixht verstehen um ein Summary zu schreiben. Ich habe schon mein Einleitung aber Hauptteil nicht :/ kann jemand mir bitte bitte helfen

Ich muss eine Zusammenfassung vom zehnten Kapitel des Buches schreiben, nur leider fällt es mir schwer den Inhalt des Kapitels kurz im Einleitungssatz wiederzugeben, weil in dem Kapitel so viel verschiedenes passiert (Knox bei der Party der Danburrys, Charlie mit Gloria, Charlie mit dem Artikel „Girls at Welton“ und der Bestrafung von Nolan, Nolans Gespräch mit Keating und einer Unterrichtsstunde mit Keating).

Falls sich jemand mit dem Buch/Film oder Zusammenfassungen auskennt, wäre es hilfreich wenn jemand helfen könnte die Themen zu kürzen :)