Ich habe eine Weile in der Universitätsbibliothek gelernt, aber sie ist ständig überfüllt und lässt mich oft keine andere Wahl, als auf dem Boden zu sitzen, was ich wirklich unangenehm und frustrierend finde... Deshalb suche ich nach Alternativen.

Hallo,

Beziehungsweise, wenn man keine benötigt, was wäre trotzdem gut, bereits davor zu wissen? In was sollte ich mich einlesen?

Google Judea and Kingdom of Israel. And while you're at it google the origins of the word Palestine as well.

The name "Palestine" has its roots in the Latin term "Palaestina," which was derived from the Greek name for the region, "Palaistinē." The term "Palaestina" was used by the Romans to refer to the territory formerly known as Judea after the Bar Kokhba revolt in the 2nd century CE. This renaming was partly intended to erase Jewish connection to the land. (Holy shit, did they do a good fucking job, didn't they?!)

Aka, the Jews were literally there before. I'm sorry for breaking this truth to you, but I'm sick and tired of this fucking implication that Jews just showed up out of nowhere one day like some virus that sprouted from the ground like fungus. It's not what happened.

The Islamic period of this land was long after the Jews. It's not their original land. Islam wasn't even a concept at the birthing dates of Judaism because Islam literally built upon Judaism. The origin land of Judaism is Judea, and for Islam, it's the Arabian Peninsula. Muslims do have the Arabian Peninsula even to this day (The city of Mecca, located in present-day Saudi Arabia, is considered the birthplace of Islam), and yet they so dearly want Judea. Ever try to see it from the perspective of a Jewish person?

Like how Muslims get to have Mecca, but when you say Judea, everyone screams that's not how it works. Like they just completely ignore every historical aspect of the land, its names, and its history. As if Jews don't have any history at all in their land. They just came out of nowhere and take people's lands?

und

Yes, it does. Because people will claim Jews are colonizers, which I just proved is wrong; Jews are idengenous to the land. So why did Jews had to return to the land? Jews started to get ethnically cleansed out of Europe: England, France, Spain to Morocco, from Morocoo to Eygpt. And from Eygpt back to 'Palestine'. Then of course as you may also known ehtnically cleaned out of Central Europe (WW2) and Russia. And you may think the ethnic cleansing was just happening in Europe, but no.

Around 900k Jews were ethnically cleansed out of MENA, leaving only 4k today. Morocco (256k), Algeria (140k), Tunisesia (105k), Libya (38k), Egypt (75k) - 5 remaining, Syria (30k) - 22 remaining, Iraq (135k) - less than 10 remaining. I could continue, but you get the idea. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_the_Muslim_world

So my question towards you is: Where is it that you expected them to go?

The obviously answer would be Judea, the anciest land of theJews. A homeland for the Jews, where they will not be ethinically cleansed out of.

und

>"could Native Americans rise up and take over US land, because it was once theirs?"

This is not a valid comparison. The concept of a Palestinian passport only emerged in 1917, after the fall of the Ottoman Empire, and even then, the entity known as 'Palestine' did not exist as a country. Palestine was simply not a thing yet. In 1948, the first Israeli passports were issued, with is only a 30-year gap between Palestinian passports. A two-state solution was necessary due to the inability of these two parties to coexist. There was no way Jews could just live under Palestine, because like yeah

Klingt das nicht etwas egoistisch? Heißt das, dass sie sich als besser ansehen als andere?

Denkt ihr, dass Juden vielleicht schnell das Gefühl haben Opfer zu sein? Liegt das vielleicht daran, dass die schlimmen Erlebnisse von damals zu einer starken Empfindlichkeit führen? Manchmal denke ich, dass Juden, besonders wenn es um Kritik an Israel geht, das gleich als antisemitisch sehen auch wenn es das gar nicht ist. Weil Antizionismus ja nicht dasselbe ist wie Antisemitismus. Wie seht ihr das? Denkt ihr, dass sie manchmal etwas zu empfindlich sind? So im allgemeinen. Will nicht missverstanden werden, sondern andere Perspektiven sehen