IST DAS GUT SO? Sehr wichtig!?

Hey! Könnt ihr bitte über meine cartoon analysis drüberlesen und mich auf Fehler aufmerksam machen oder Dinge die ich noch hinzufügen sollte? Und wichtig: was soll ich bei der Einleitung angeben um welches Thema/ welche 2 Themen es hier geht?? Danke!!!

The cartoon was drawn by Patrick Chappate. It was published on Tuesday, October, 30th, 2018 In the New York Times and was created in response to US- president Donald Trumps immigration policy, specifically his plan of building a wall between Mexico and the US in order to keep undocumented immigrants out of the country.

The cartoon is made up of an axis reflection, which represents Donald Trump on the left side with his typical look a Swede in combination with a red tie and his uniquely styled blond hair. He is sitting on a chair which is standing ahead of a big American flag. Trump is doing an OK gesture with an convinced facial expression. Towards him is the German chancellor Angela Merkel, also sitting on a chair with a German flag behind of her. Merkel can be identified by her haircut, her facial features and the clothing style. The expression of the German chancellor is annoyed. There is a speech bubble above Trumps head which says “You guys in Berlin had a terrific wall”. Also the background is colourless and unobtrusive while both figures and the flags are colourized. In the cartoon, Donald Trump is praising the Berlin Wall, even though by society at large it is generally seen as a symbol of oppression. Merkel clearly has the same adverse opinion what is noticeable on the criticising and bugged countenance of her. Because of the German flag it seems very obviously, that Merkel is representing the German nation, which has seen the Berlin Wall as negative. Trump is saying his favourite word “terrific”, which is typical for the US president. That is symbolic for the usual egoistic manner everybody is expecting from him. Clearly, the cartoonist is trying to imply, that the Berlin Wall and the wall that Trump wants to build on the US-Mexican border are similar. This is recognisable because of the depiction and the pictorial division. Both countries are shown in a similar way, because of the axis reflection in the cartoon. The two flags are positioned the same way and are both representing their countries, just as Donald Trump and Angela Merkel. Although the comparison is hampered a little by the fact, that the Berlin Wall was built to keep citizens in East Berlin from leaving the GDR, unlike the wall that Trump wants to build which is supposed to keep foreigners from entering the US. Noticeable is also, that the background is unobtrusive and colourless in contrast to the politicians and both flags. That shows, how important this political theme is.

danach schreib ich noch meine eigene Meinung hin.

bitte um Tipps ich muss es morgen abgeben und das ist meine Chance für eine 2 auf dem Zeugnis und die brauche ich ich mache Abitur !!!

Bild zum Beitrag

2 Antworten

MonumentValleys

12.01.2020, 20:58

Ein oder zwei seltsame Formulierungen die aber nicht drastisch sind.

Du könntest noch etwas tiefer in die Interpretation bzw Aussage gehen, dann ist das ziemlich wahrscheinlich eine "sehr gut".

viel Glück

Seerosenwasser

Fragesteller

12.01.2020, 21:14

Inwiefern und wo genau? Bitte antworten! Kannst du eventuell ein Beispiel geben? Danke <3

MonumentValleys

12.01.2020, 21:53

@Seerosenwasser

formulierungen die sehr auffalen+ correction

also the background is colourless.. - lass das also weg

merkel clearly has the same advers... -merkel expresses the opposite view wich is clearly shown by ..

This is recognisable because of the depiction. -This is recognizable based on the depiction ...

on a chair which is standing ahead of.. -.. in front of..

Clearly, the cartoonist is trying to imply,.. - the cartoonist is clearly trying to imply,..(ist nicht falsch aber sehr komisch im bezug auf die anderen sätze)

Inhalt

gehe mehr auf den Fakt ein das trump mit dieser Aussage viele negative aspekte ignoriert, wie zum beispiel die Trennung die viele durch die mauer erfahren haben, und die Tatsache, dass die Mauer die er bauen will auch viele nachteile hat. Intigriere sein dogmatisches verhalten.

diese kritik an trumps verhalten und politik ist meiner meinung nach die hauptaussage des cartoons

Seerosenwasser

Fragesteller

12.01.2020, 22:12

@MonumentValleys

Vielen Dank ! Will also folgendes noch hinzufügen:

German people experienced having a wall and they know how hard it can be. Lots of people suffered and wanted the freedom they had once. Independence, liberty and the decision about their own destiny, those are aspects which didn’t mattered in those people’s life anymore. Furthermore there are many other disadvantages for building a wall. That’s the reason why Merkel is thinking, that Trumps plan is absurd.

MonumentValleys

12.01.2020, 22:26

@Seerosenwasser

Grammatik ist unbedenklich, allerdings bin ich nicht sicher ob du so weit gehen solltest, Merkels Gedanken zu interpretieren, denn alle Informationen die du hier über sie hast basieren auf ihrem Gesichtsausdruck.

Ich würde statt dessen mit einem Satz wie “This dogmatic behaviour and Trumps obvious joy are the reason for Merkel's distant reaction and also the reason why im am thinking...“ zu deiner Meinung überleiten

MonumentValleys

12.01.2020, 22:26

@MonumentValleys

Also nur den letzten Satz ersetzten

AndreStrozewski

Nutzer, der sehr aktiv auf gutefrage ist

im Thema Politik

13.01.2020, 12:07

Trumps Meinung zu Mauern an sich...!?

Woher ich das weiß:eigene Erfahrung

Ich habe gerade als Übung für mein Englisch Abitur eine "Cartoon Analysis" geschrieben, und würde mich freuen wenn ihr mir ein paar Verbesserungstipps geben könntet.

Trump Commiserates With Angela Merkel:

By Patrick Chappatte, published on Tuesday, October 30, 2018

The cartoon "Trump Commiserates With Angela Merkel", was published on Tuesday, October 30, 2018 in the New York Times, and deals with US-president Donald Trumps immigration policy, specifically his plan of building a wall between Mexico and the US, in order to keep undocumented immigrants out of the country. The cartoonists name is Patrick Chapette.

In the foreground of the cartoon, you can recognize Trump by his typical suit with a red tie, his uniquely styled blond hair and the "okay" sign that he is doing. In a chair across from him, sits the German chancellor Angela Merkel, who can be identified by her facial features and her haircut. Trump has a speech bubble above his head, which reads "YOU GUYS IN BERLIN HAD A TERRIFIC WALL". In the backround behind Trumps chair on the left side, there is a US-flag, and behind Angela Merkel, there is a German one.

In the cartoon, Trump states that the Berlin Wall was "terrific", even though by society at large it is generally seen as a symbol of opression. Clearly, the cartoonist is trying to imply, that the Berlin Wall and the wall that Trump wants to built on the US-Mexican border are similar. Because the cartoonist is drawing that comparisson, it is to be assumed that Patrick Chappette is very critical towards Trumps plan.

In my opinion, Patrick Chapettes point comes across fairly well trough the cartoon, because the Berlin Wall is very well known, and almost universally seen as negative. Although the comparison is hampered a little by the fact, that the Berlin Wall was built to keep citizens in East Berlin from LEAVING the GDR, unlike the wall that Trump wants to built, which is supposed to keep foreigneers from ENTERING the US. Nevertheless, there are also a lot of similarities, like the brutal methods that Trump wants to use, to make sure that the border is protected, going so far as to shoot people before they can cross it. (Whitch is comparable to the methods the GDRs government used.) Furthermore, I think the cartoon is easy to understand, because the politicians that are portrayed, are made very recognizable by of the characteristics that I have listed in my discription of the cartoon. Finally, I agree with the opinion of the author regarding Trumps immigration policy. To my mind, it is inhumane and xenophobic. If people are willing to risk their lifes to cross a border, be it too escape a country of to enter another, the government should focus on improving the situation in those countrys, that have unbearable living conditions. They should give refugees shelter instead of hindering them from crossing the border by all means necessary

...zur Frage

Wie findet ihr meine cartoon analyse?

The cartoon "Trump Commiserates with Angela Merkel" was published by the New York Times on October 30, 2018. In this cartoon I can see Angela merkel and Donald trump.

They are sitting on chairs in a room with 2 flags one flag is the flag from Germany and the other one is the flag of the USA. Donald Trump is doing an OK gesture with his hand. Donald trump is wearing a blue suit blue with Trouser and blue shoes. Angela Merkel is wearing a green dress outfit with green High Heels.

I can see a speech bubble over donald trump that states ‚ You guys in Berlin had a terrific wall‘. I think this cartoon is probably referring to the planned wall in mexico by ex president Donald Trump. The message of this cartoon is that donald trump thinks that the Berlin wall was good because it separted the upper class west people from the down class west people . Thats also the intent of Donald Trump he wants to separate the Mexican citizens from the Americans. I think this cartoon is making fun of the idea that donald trump wanted to build a wall between the border of the usa and mexico. The cartoon delivers the message very good because its comparing the wall of berlin to the planned mexico wall and that comparison

shows that a mexican border isnt good. Because its just separating 2 groups of people. I think we are all people and we shouldnt separate people just because

someone thinks they are worse than the other. This cartoon does a very good job in being funny whilst still being serios

in some way. I would give this cartoon a 9/10.

...zur Frage

Kann jemand meine kurze Cartoon Beschreibung korrigieren?

Hey Leute, ich hab ein Cartoon Beschrieben. Kann mir jemand vielleicht Tipps zur Beschreibung eines Cartoons geben und meine Fehler korrigieren?

<a href="https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/50/7e/25/507e252f9cf1f8e1c46851e0c2601da2.jpg">https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/50/7e/25/507e252f9cf1f8e1c46851e0c2601da2.jpg</a>

The single cartoon by Randy Glasbergen, taken from the website "www..." shows two persons who are dating for the first time.

On the left hand site of the cartoon is a man sitting on a chair and infront of him is a table. On this table is a open laptop which is standing also infront of him. The man is looking at the laptop. Above him is a speech bubble which says,"...". On the other site of the table is a woman sitting on a chair and holding a mobilephone. She is looking to the mobilephone. Next to her is a full wine glas. Above the woman is a speech bubble which says, "..". In the middle of the table is a candle. The scene is taking place at a restaurant.

The message of the cartoon is that both know eachother from online chats but on the first date they still communicate about technology to eachother because they do not know how to do it in real life.

...zur Frage

Cartoon analysis?

MESSAGE:

The painter of the cartoon is making clear that the people in the picture are immigrants from different countrys, which you can notice by their looks and they are all learning english in a classroom which you can also see by the poster on the upper left corner. The author of the cartoon makes also clear that there are many people from different country‘s where english is spoken in their own way of talking. There are so many accents, slang words which can make it difficult to understand a person from another country. The uncomfortable athmosphere and the confused looks of the people in the picture symoblizes that they all can‘t understand each other. The boy who is holding a poster is a example for the different accents of english. He is from Glasgow and his english is incomprehensible for the teacher and that‘s the reason why he is assigned to the course.

kann man hier noch was wichtiges dazu schreiben?

und könnt ihr mich bitte verbessern?

danke schön!

...zur Frage

Könnte jemand bitte meine cartoon analyse korrigieren und Verbesserungsvorschläge geben?

Das ist der Link : https://www.flickr.com/photos/karikaturalv/24225635546/

The title of the cartoon from Gatis Sluka drawn in 2016 is “Globalization”. The cartoon is from the website www.flickr.com and it criticizes that humans destroy the world.

...zur Frage

Cartoon Analysis Globalization?

Hallo, kann jemand meine Cartoon Analysis korrigieren und mir vielleicht ein paar Tipps dazu geben?

This is a cartoon drawn by Kat J.Weiss, published on 12/5/19 on www.istockphoto.com and it deals with the issue of fast fashion. What is noticeable at the first glance is that the artist presents a serious topic in a simple and ironic way.The scene depicts an abstract situation in a third world country in comparison to an industrialising country. On the right, there is appearing a western women which is underlined by the clothes she is wearing. Moreover, you can easily notice a poisonous river in the left part of the picture. Another significant aspect is the center of the picture which shows us a large billboard with a caption above it which reads "THIS COULD BE U". Behind the billboard, there is sitting a women working on a sewinh machine. Her facial expression seems to be exhausted and tired. Especially striking are the bright colours that the artist used.The artist creates a negative atmosphere towards the aspect that we are not aware of where and under which conditions our fashion is produced This will be shown in detail in the following talk. The artist refers to a well known global issue such as fast fashion. Furthermore, he strongly criticises our lack of awareness about fast fashion.First of all, you can clearly notice that the artist tries to draw the audiences attention to the fact that the scene depicts the horrendous and miserable working conditions of people who produce fashion by representing the womens facial expression. From her facial expression you can conclude how exhausted and frustrated she must be. That is exactly how the cartoon is supposed to make us overthink our attitude towards fast fashion. Moreover, the artist makes use of bright colours. Ultimately, common sense indicates that the colours are used to make the cartoon more vivid which clarifies the Intent of the cartoon which is to raise the People`s awareness for fast fashion. A further significant aspect is that the artist attempts to win us over to his side by triggering our emotions. This becomes more apparent while looking closely at the water colours from river which shows us how many chemicals are inside the water. That is why we become compassionate with the local citizens.

In conclusion I can express that the artists conveys his intention impeccably and extremely effectively from my point of view. Without any doubt the artist exactly knows how to trigger the audiences emotions properly. I also assume that he wants us to see fast fashion as horrible and horrendous. Moreover, he absolutely convinces me by his impeccably used visual elements which make sure we cannot misunderstand his concisely communicated message. Additionally I believe that his criticism is justified due to the fact that we are accountable as customers for the future of employees in the fashion industry. So it`s our mandatory duty to rearrange our attitude toward fast fashion.

...zur Frage

Cartoonanalyse in Englisch ( Bitte hilft mir )

Hallöchen :) Also ich habe eine Hausaufgabe aufbekommen und ich bekomme darauf ne Note . Leider ist es so , dass ich in Englisch die Grammatik nicht gut beherrsche und ich müsste mich durch die Hü`s und Hausaufgaben mich verbessern, damit ich eine gute Note bekomme im Zeugnis . Ich wäree sehr sehr dankbar wenn ihr meine grammatikalischen Fehler verbessern könntet wenn ihr welche entdeckt beim Lesen.

In the cartoon, which is black-and-white drawing, you can see two men, which are standing to each other. The man on the left side is little and lean. His clothes are cracked. The other man on the right side appears strong and wealthy because of his buisness suit and bag. The cartoon includes a speech that is called Australian mateship and the use of the wordMate``. In addition there are two speechs bubbles. The little man asks to the big man: Exuse me mate. Could you spare a coupleof dollars for a cup of coffee.and the strong man answers: Sorry Mate.

The words in the cartoon underline the cartonnists message. The cartoonist wants to show to the viewer that the wordmate have not always the same meaning. You can say that there are two types of mateship. One of the type is that mates spend much time and tell their secrets etc. But in this cartoon the viewer gets the impression that the mens meet for the first time and they are notmates. The little man wants that the strong man helps him but he did not want and he excused himself in a friendly way. But you know appart of the clothes that he has enough money, so he could spend money .The cartoonist expresses thtat Australian peoples are friendly and polite to each other and for this reason they use the wordmate. But this situation does not agree thereal`mateship because real mates would always help themselves.In this cartoon is the strong man avaricious but he excuseshim politely.

I think the cartoon is easy to understand because if you know what mateship means in Australia, it is clear that in this case friendship does not have the same meaning. Therefore you find out that the word mate has several meanings for Australian peoples.

...zur Frage

Describe cartoon?

Hallo, also zur Zeit machen wir in Englisch das Thema Südafrika und wir haben diesen Comic bekommen und den müssen wir beschreiben ich hab einen Text geschrieben kann jemand mir das bitte für mich korrigieren und mir Tipps geben.

Mein Text:

In the picture I see an elephant who is sitting on an old white men. His head is red, next to him is a gun. The elephant is looking angry and has a lot of energy. On the elephants foot is a crown. There are some symbols above his head : A flash, a cloud, and a spiral. The cloud means to sing about something, the flash is Energy or fury and the spiral means movement. I think the cartoon is about a man who wanted to shoot the elephant. But is elephant is stronger and for him it is easy to win. He is the winner and gets the crown. With this cartoon I think the artist want to say that animals are strong and sometimes dangerous, when you do things they hate.The cartoon shows the power that African peoples have. The elephant seems to be the African nation. The Africans want to get the crown Back from the white old man. He is white, that means Europeans. I think the cartoon wants to say the Africans are angry and want to have the same rights are as the white people.

...zur Frage

Passt das so? Oder könnt ihr was umschreiben (Englisch)?

The black and white cartoon is showing in the middle of the picture a big fat white man in an suit who is sitting on a chair with an fork in his hand. There is a big table in front of the fat man with our earth on it which he is eating. In the right corner of the cartoon is also a little thin black man in underwear who is looking up to the white man while he is holding a small plate in his hand. The thin man is trying to catch the earth crumbs which the old man is throwing to him.

Ich danke euch

...zur Frage

Ich habe einen Text zu diesem Cartoon geschrieben, jedoch weiß ich nicht ob es genügend ist?

[…]. It is about global warming, which includes both climate change and economic climate, which means that the cartoonist shows a serious and important critical point.

The cartoon is divided into two parts.

in the upper right corner, it says "pick one..." and below it is a cross with the phrase "this green," which refers to a us dollar, a company, and a car. the co2 emissions also come from the company and the car.

It also says "save the economic climate" next to the picture.

on the right, another cross is possible with the same phrase "this green" indicating a natural environment such as a tree and the sun. also, next to it is "save the earth climate".

The cartoon represent the only two options people can choose between, whether they prefer to save the Earth's climate or the economy.

If one chooses one of the two options, the other is still a problem.

So, choosing to "save the climate"

would lead to a lot of economic problems because money, such as dollars, would not be produced because businesses produce a lot of CO2 emissions. This means that people would not have dollars and the UK could not be sovereign and leave the EU. A decision for the earth's climate also means that cars are banned or become more expensive because they cause CO2 emissions, even though so many people need a car.

On the other hand, a decision to "save the economic climate" would damage the entire environment because of all the CO2 emissions.

in my opinion, the cartoonist is successful in presenting the only two options people can choose between, either to save the economy or to save the earth's climate, without making any other choice. it's more a matter of damaging the environment or stopping economic growth, both of which have consequences. so it's difficult to choose one term.

I also appeal the cartoon because it is very difficult to pick for only one of the "Greens" and stay away from the others because i am in fact very depending on e.g. technology.

So for me, the cartoon is a good example because it just shows the serious problem we are in right now.

...zur Frage

Englisch Analyse?kreieren?

Kann jemand von euch mir den Text korrigieren?!

The cartoon is drawing by a cartoonist named Mueller and published in Bath. The cartoonist is signed the picture at the bottom right. The cartoon is showing a woman holding a phone to her ear. The woman is wearing a long-sleeved top, has black hair and is also wearing glasses. On the right side, one can see a fridge and on the left side a shelf in the background. The foreground is showing an table, with an opened laptop and a cup of tea. The colors of the cartoon are black and white. In the picture below on the left is a following sentence, "A bunch of friends come. over to stare at their phones."

The following analysis will illustrate that it is about a new generation communication disorder.

The woman in the cartoon is on the phone and says "A bunch of friends are coming over to stare at their phones." The artist could mean that phones are not good for people, due to lack of communication in society. He could also mean that smartphones or electronic devices in general distract us too much and that they are already part of our body when we humans, can't even put them down for a moment.

All in all, I think the cartoon is true, because people only use their electronic devices for communication

...zur Frage

Speech in English?

Kann mir jemand bei dieser Rede von Obama weiterhelfen? Also was ist eure Meinung zu dieser Rede?

Das wäre sehr nett, danke :)

For as much as government can do and must do it is ultimately the faith and determination of the american people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job which sees us trough our darkest hours. It is the firefighter courge to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parents willingness to nature a child that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new. But those values upon which our success depends-hard work and honesty, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism-these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history.

What is demanded then is a return to these truths.

What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility - a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world: duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying of the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence - the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed - why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent mall, and why a man whose father less than 60 years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

...zur Frage

Englisch Bildbeschreibung ist das so ok 2??

The cartoon by Phil published on the internet website summener.org with the caption "" deals with the Brexit under the leadership of Borris Johnssen.

In the centre of the cartoon is a big ship with the inscription "Great Britain", that is crashing into a big ice rock with the inscription "EU" and the stars of the eu flag on it.

Moreover, the ship and ice rock are surrounded by water in the bottom of the cartoon.

Also there is a man with blond hair, that is wearing a suit on the top of the ship. He is saying throught a speech bubble "Ich bin...". The speeh bubble is on the top left corner of the cartoon. Furthermore the ship has cracks on the spots that are hitting the ice rock. So of course the ship is sinking .

His body language and face expression shows, that he is insane and crazy. Moreover, throught the details that the man has like the blond hair and originally face erverybody can see that the man stands for Borris Johnnnes.

...zur Frage

Wer Lust sich nen „argumentative text“ durchzulesen?

Nabend,

In meiner (sehr kleinen) Familie kennt sich keiner mit 'English Grammar’ aus.
Naja, es ist jedenfalls ein Text auf Englisch, eine Seite lang. Brauche just Verbesserungsvorschläge und Kritik.

Danke danke 💀✨

alsoo:

Argumentative text

A statement that is often discussed by liguists is whether German similar to English serves as a lingua franca.

An argument in favor would be that German is spoken in many parts of the world. So overall 180 million people speak German worldwide. The german language is even in eleventh place among the most spoken languages in the world.

Furthermore, German is the most spoken language in europe. For example in Austria, Swisse, Namibia and parts of the Netherlands.

And moreover, it is closely related to other languages which makes it easier to learn. Swedish, Norwegian and Danish are often mentioned as examples.

In order to come to a balanced conclusion, I will now explain the other point of view.

At first, English is used much more often as an official language than German. Especially in Africa, as these countries were former colonies. There are many countries whose universities teach in english. In Germany, for example, around 600 courses are taught exlusively in english.

Secondly, German itsself is a language which is very hard to learn because of the grammar. And in comparison, English is much easier to understand and learn. So other countries do not educate their pupils German at school which is another disadvantage.

Last but not least, German is mainly spoken in countries which are close to each other. But it is less spoken in countries that are further away.

Personally, I am more convinced by the contra side. I believe that English is best suited as a lingua franca. Of course, German is also in some way a lingua franca but I do not think that it serves as such similar to English. Therefore it would be also contraproductive to classify German as the new official communication level.

...zur Frage

Was möchtest Du wissen?

Deine Frage stellen