Wie findet ihr dieses Bild von Stalin?

7 Antworten

Vom Fragesteller als hilfreich ausgezeichnet

Die "bio" ist der größte Unsinn den ich seit längerem gelesn habe. Ohne das amerikanische Lend-Lease Programm, wäre die Sowjetunion trotz ihrem unendlichen Nachschub an Soldaten untergegangen.

Kurz vor dem Kollaps stand sie ja des Öfteren zu Kriegszeiten. Dass Stalins Reich nicht dem weit kleineren Deutschland zum Opfer gefallen ist, kann er Roosevelt verdanken. Von "b**ch slap" kann man da dann wohl kaum reden.


earnest  22.05.2021, 09:40

Du hast anscheinend die Frage ein wenig aus den Augen verloren.

2
Halloichmagkuh  22.05.2021, 15:54

Was haben die denen denn geliehen?

0
verreisterNutzer  22.05.2021, 16:05

So ein Unsinn wenn die USA die Sowjet-Union Ökonomisch so in der Hand gehabt hätten wie waren dann Vietnam und der Korea Krieg zustande gekommen warum hat Amerika da nicht die Sowjets erpresst?

0
miristfad  22.05.2021, 18:28
@verreisterNutzer

Frisch aus Wikipedia. Wie du unten siehst hat sogar Stalin selbst gesagt, dass er ohne die USA nie den Krieg gewonnen hätte.

Aber na klar, du bist schlauer als alle Sowjetgeneräle und Stalin höchstpersönlich.🤦🏻‍♂️

In total, 92.7% of the wartime production of railroad equipment by the USSR was supplied by Lend-Lease.

Much of the logistical assistance of the Soviet military was provided by hundreds of thousands of U.S.-made trucks and by 1945, nearly a third of the truck strength of the Red Army was U.S.-built. Trucks such as the Dodge 3⁄4-ton and Studebaker 2+1⁄2-ton were easily the best trucks available in their class on either side on the Eastern Front. American shipments of telephone cable, aluminum, canned rations and clothing were also critical. Lend-Lease also supplied significant amounts of weapons and ammunition. The Soviet air force received 18,200 aircraft, which amounted to about 30 percent of Soviet wartime fighter and bomber production (mid 1941–45). About 7,000 Lend-Lease tanks (plus more than 5,000 British tanks) were used by the Red Army.

A particular critical aspect of Lend-Lease was the supply of food. The invasion had cost the USSR a huge amount of its agricultural base; during the initial Axis offensive of 1941-42, the total sown area of the USSR fell by 41.9% and the number of collective and state farms by 40%. The Soviets lost a substantial number of draft and farm animals as they were not able to relocate all the animals in an area before it was captured and of those areas in which the Axis forces would occupy, the Soviets had lost 7 million of out of 11.6 million horses, 17 million out of 31 million cows, 20 million of 23.6 million pigs and 27 million out of 43 million sheep and goats. Tens of thousands of agricultural machines, such as tractors and threshers, were destroyed or captured. Agriculture also suffered a loss of labour; between 1941 and 1945, 19.5 million working-age men had to leave their farms to work in the military and industry. Agricultural issues were also compounded when the Soviets were on the offensive, as areas liberated from the Axis had been devastated and contained millions of people who needed to be fed. Lend-Lease thus provided a massive number of foodstuffs and agricultural products.

According to the Russian historian Boris Vadimovich Sokolov, Lend-Lease had a crucial role in winning the war:

On the whole the following conclusion can be drawn: that without these Western shipments under Lend-Lease the Soviet Union not only would not have been able to win the Great Patriotic War, it would not have been able even to oppose the German invaders, since it could not itself produce sufficient quantities of arms and military equipment or adequate supplies of fuel and ammunition. The Soviet authorities were well aware of this dependency on Lend-Lease. Thus, Stalin told Harry Hopkins [FDR's emissary to Moscow in July 1941] that the U.S.S.R. could not match Germany's might as an occupier of Europe and its resources.

Nikita Khrushchev, having served as a military commissar and intermediary between Stalin and his generals during the war, addressed directly the significance of Lend-lease aid in his memoirs:

I would like to express my candid opinion about Stalin's views on whether the Red Army and the Soviet Union could have coped with Nazi Germany and survived the war without aid from the United States and Britain. First, I would like to tell about some remarks Stalin made and repeated several times when we were "discussing freely" among ourselves. He stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war. No one ever discussed this subject officially, and I don't think Stalin left any written evidence of his opinion, but I will state here that several times in conversations with me he noted that these were the actual circumstances. He never made a special point of holding a conversation on the subject, but when we were engaged in some kind of relaxed conversation, going over international questions of the past and present, and when we would return to the subject of the path we had traveled during the war, that is what he said. When I listened to his remarks, I was fully in agreement with him, and today I am even more so.

Joseph Stalin, during the Tehran Conference during 1943, acknowledged publicly the importance of American efforts during a dinner at the conference: "Without American machines the United Nations could never have won the war."

In a confidential interview with the wartime correspondent Konstantin Simonov, the Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov is quoted as saying:

Today [1963] some say the Allies didn't really help us ... But listen, one cannot deny that the Americans shipped over to us material without which we could not have equipped our armies held in reserve or been able to continue the war.
0
verreisterNutzer  22.05.2021, 18:50
@miristfad

Da haben wir uns wohl etwas falsch verstanden, Ich dachte durch deine Aussage das gemeint wäre das die Sowjet-Union im generellen und über die Herrschaft Stalins hinaus von den USA abhängig wären.

0

Die Collage ist meiner Meinung nach nicht schlecht gemacht. Doch Stalin hätte ich da nicht erkannt. Kann deshalb zweifach nicht mitlachen.  

Ausser daß da Stalin druntersteht: Wo soll das Stalin sein? Der Kopf ist es nicht, der Körper ist es nicht, so what? Was soll daran Parodie sein?


Selbstwert1112 
Fragesteller
 04.06.2021, 11:25

Doch das ist Stalins Gesichts als er noch Jung war. Google mal

0

Etwas gewöhnungsbedürftig

Woher ich das weiß:Studium / Ausbildung – Ich studiere Geschichte und bin an Politik interessiert