Ich bin mir halt nicht sicher, ob mein comment in Fach Englisch mir gelungen ist, daher wäre ein Feedback nett :)
Many people argue whether or not the British monarchy should be abolished.
In the following, I present arguments for and against a monarchy so that you can form your own pinion.
On the one hand, the British monarchy should be abolished because a monarch only rules but has no real political power or function. this means that a queen or king is unnecessary and unimportant to the state.
Also, the UK is not a democracy, as is claimed, because in a democracy people can elect the head of state, but since the royal family is still alive, they will continue to be the head of state.
This is very unfair and unequal to the rest of the population.
Also, people can never be 100% sure if the next monarch is good for the state and does not have bad intentions.
This could make people very worried.
Another important aspect is that the royal family spends a lot of money on the palace when they could use the money for more important things.
On the other hand, the British monarchy should not be abolished, because a monarch is very important even if he or she has no real political power.
His or her importance is reflected in national stability.
Since a monarch embodies the British history, values and tradition, this leads to stronger national identification, which brings people closer together so that there is national stability.
In addition, members of the royal family are very important to charities, because since the royal family has a good image and is important, charities can be heard better, so they continue with their charities.
Some people may think that a monarch spends a lot of money, but that doesn't mean a president doesn't.
there are many presidents with many
There are also many presidents with many offices, even more than the British monarch.
The fact that the royal family has always been at the head of the state means that people trust it because they know its good intentions.
This means that the monarchy is in safe hands, so to speak.
Another important point is that the royal family has shown that it can modernize and adapt to the times.
This is very important because many people claim that they are unmodern and have different thoughts than today.
But the Queen, for example, has allowed her son Charles to marry a divorced woman, whereas in the past this was a very dangerous issue.
that means she was able to “modernise”.
Weighing the pros and cons of the British monarchy, one can say that it should not be abolished because the British monarchy has been very successful, mainly because it has adapted to the times and modernized.
Na das stimmt überhaupt nich
Was lügst einfach rum?