Frage von Deniz188, 17

Kann mir jemand diese englischen Texte korrigieren ?

Man kann sagen, dass ich in englisch eine Niete bin 😄 Als Hausaufgabe haben wir 2 Schreibaufgaben aufbekommen kann jemand der sich mit der Grammatik und Rechtschreibung und allem drum und dran in englisch auskennt die Fehler zu korrigieren? Hier sind die Texte - At the beginning Laura's and Mike's feelings are okay, to Laura admits that she was on a date with Mike and it isn't is a rumour which Melanie and Janine had heard. As Melanie and Janine try to make Mike sick, Laura defends him by saying that he's the first guy who cares and interest about her. Not like the other boys. All this she said peacefull and honestly. It is their indifferent what Melanie and Janine say. Laura feels disappointed and horrified of her girlfriends. Mike is in love with Laura, however seems robbe insecure and thoughtful. Ist is because his feiend Scooter is just interesting how Laura Looks and not as her character is. Mike tries to make clear to Scooter that he really loves Laura nur he dont want to destroy it.

Hier ist der zweite Text, es soll eine Erörterung sein

It is given a statement that people who have nothing or little in common cannot be friends or couples. First of all, I think that it could be difficult to be friends or to be together because of not in common. That is why the persons without similarities can't do different things together. For example the one person loves to go swimming but the other person don't like this and prefer to go to a library. Moreover the friends from the clique couldn't be accept the new friend without common. It is because of another interest verwesen the clique and the other person. Let give me an example. A person is interested in social things like voluntary commitment and the other person is interested in action things like free climbing, skydiving or for example in motorcycling. In contrast to this disadvantages are advantages too. Firstly, the persons don't have the same hobbies. That is why they can do another things and not always the same. For instance they can do action and social things together. Secondly, you can experience new things which you wouldn't do before. At last significant point is that you can learn many things from the other person which can cause that's it's interesting for the other person . I am of the opinion that you can be friends or couples in spite of have nothing or little in common because it's not important to have the same interests, but willing to share your interests with an another and to deal with other interests. In addition is the character important not the in common.

So ich weiß es ist viel Ich danke schon mal im Vorraus fals sich jemand Zeit nimmt es zu korrigieren :)

Expertenantwort
von AstridDerPu, Community-Experte für Englisch, 13

At (Präposition) the beginning (Komma) Laura's and Mike's feelings are okay (Punkt) Laura admits that she was on a date (Ausdruck) with Mike and it isn't (---) a rumour (---) Melanie and Janine had heard. As (Wort) Melanie and Janine try to make Mike sick, Laura defends him by saying that he's the first guy who cares and interest (Zeit) about (Präposition) her (Komma) not like (Wort) the other boys. All this she said (Zeit) peacefull (RS; Wortart) and honestly. It is their indifferent (Ausdruck) what Melanie and Janine say. Laura feels disappointed and horrified of her girlfriends. Mike is in love with Laura, however seems robbe (???) insecure and thoughtful. Ist (RS) is because his feiend (RS) Scooter is just interesting (Ausdruck) how Laura Looks (RS) and not as her character is (Ausdruck). Mike tries to make clear to Scooter that he really loves Laura nur (deutsch) he dont (Grammatik; RS) want to destroy it.

Bitte überprüfe auch die verwendeten Zeiten. Die wichtigste Zeit in einer Summary ist das Present Simple.

It is given (Ausdruck) a statement that people who have nothing or little in common cannot be friends or couples. First of all, I think that it could be difficult to be friends or to be together because of not in common (Ausdruck) (Wiederholung). That is why the persons (Grammatik) without similarities can't do different things (Stil) together.

For example (Komma) (---) one person loves to go swimming but the other person don't (Grammar) like this (Wort) and prefer (Grammar) to go to a library. Moreover (Komma) the friends from the clique couldn't be accept (Grammar) the new friend without common (Ausdruck). It is because of another interest verwesen (deutsch) the clique and the other person. (Dieser Satz ergibt keinen Sinn.)

Let give me an example. (Satzstellung) A person is interested in social things (Stil) (Komma) like voluntary commitment and the (Artikel) other person is interested in action things (Stil) (Komma) like free climbing, skydiving or (---) motorcycling. In contrast to this (Grammar) disadvantages (Hier fehlt ein Wort.) are advantages too. Firstly, the persons (Grammar) don't have the same hobbies. That is why they can do another (Grammar) things (Stil) and not always the same (Ausdruck). For instance (Komma) they can do action (Ausdruck) and social things (Stil) together.

Secondly, you (Warum wechselst du hier von they zu you?) can experience new things (Ausdruck) which you wouldn't do (Zeit) before. At (RS) last significant point is that you can learn many things from the other person (Plural) which can cause that's it's (Ausdruck) interesting for the other person.

I am of the opinion that you can be friends or couples in spite of have (Gerund) nothing or little in common because it's not important to have the same interests, but (Hier fehlt ein Verb.) willing to share your interests with an another (Grammar, RS, Ausdruck) and to deal with other interests. In addition (Komma) is the character important not the in common (Ausdruck). (Satzstellung)

Das Fettgedruckte muss korrigiert werden. Ich hoffe, ich habe nichts übersehen.

Für das Vokabular und die Rechtschreibung empfehle ich ein gutes (online) Wörterbuch, z.B. pons.com,

für die Grammatik ego4u.de und englisch-hilfen.de.

AstridDerPu

Antwort
von Candee246, 17

It is given a statement that people who have nothing or little in common cannot be friends or couples. First of all, I think that it could be difficult to be friends or to be together because of not in common. That is why the persons without similarities can't do different things together. For example the one person loves to go swimming but the other person don't like this and prefer to go to a library. Moreover the friends from the clique couldn't be accept the new friend without common. It is because of another interest verwesen the clique and the other person. Let give me an example. A person is interested in social things like voluntary commitment and the other person is interested in action things like free climbing, skydiving or for example in motorcycling. In contrast to this disadvantages are advantages too. Firstly, the persons don't have the same hobbies. That is why they can do another things and not always the same. For instance they can do action and social things together. Secondly, you can experience new things which you wouldn't do before. At last significant point is that you can learn many things from the other person which can cause that's it's interesting for the other person . I am of the opinion that you can be friends or couples in spite of have nothing or little in common because it's not important to have the same interests, but willing to share your interests with an another and to deal with other interests. In addition is the character important not the in common.

Hast du das durch den google übersetzer gejagt. Mache den ersten satz. It is given a statement that people who have nothing and living in small groups cannot be friends or couples. Merks du den unterschied.

Kommentar von Deniz188 ,

Danke :)

Nein ich hab nur einzelne Wörter nachgeschaut die ich nicht aus dem Kopf susste

Keine passende Antwort gefunden?

Fragen Sie die Community

Weitere Fragen mit Antworten